Legal Opinion

Adair v. Nashville Housing Authority

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 5, 1974No. Civ. A. 5686 and 6021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

This suit was originally brought on the 26th day of March, 1970, by property owners in the University Center Urban Renewal Project area (hereinafter referred to as “Tennessee R-51”) located in Nashville, Tennessee. The present defendants are the Nashville Housing Authority (hereinafter referred to as “NHA”), Jack Herrington, Secretary and Executive Director of NHA, The Vanderbilt University and the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Renewal (HUD). The suit was not brought as a class action.

The cases were tried…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rudder v. Wise County Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  2. Battison v. City of Niles, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
  3. R. L. Gardner and Ruth Gardner v. The Nashville Housing Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashvilleand Davidson County, Tennessee, Charles H. Adair and June P. Adair v. The Nashville Housing Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashvilleand Davidson County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Gardner v. Nashville Housing Authority of Metropolitan GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API