Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Nashville Housing Authority of Metropolitan Government
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1975No. Nos. 74-1687, 74-1688PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
This is the second appeal involved in this litigation (See Gardner v. Nashville Housing Authority, 468 F.2d 480 (6th Cir. 1972)). At the first hearing United States District Judge Morton had dis*40missed the complaints in these two cases because plaintiffs had failed to join the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This court agreed that HUD was a necessary party for federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1970), but vacated judgment so that plaintiffs could amend to join the essential federal department as a party.
After the amendment and the joining of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Woodland Market Realty Company v. City of Cleveland, East 55th-Woodland Improvement Company, and Frank M. Brennan, Cuyahoga County TreasurerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Gibson & Perin Co., and Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Gardner v. Nashville Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- R. L. Gardner and Ruth Gardner v. The Nashville Housing Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashvilleand Davidson County, Tennessee, Charles H. Adair and June P. Adair v. The Nashville Housing Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashvilleand Davidson County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975