Cosmopolitan Financial Corp. v. Runnels
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HAYASHI, C.J.
Appellant appeals from a judgment entered below finding liability against Appellee Runnels only on a promissory note due appellant.
The paramount issues raised on appeal are (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting testimony concerning contemporaneous statements made to defendants-appellees by the payee corporation’s officer to the effect that the promissory notes signed by them would not be enforced against them; and (2) whether indorsers-guarantors of a promissory note payable to a financial institution can be relieved of liability on the instrument…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Akamine & Sons, Ltd. v. American Security BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc. v. DolinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Wilson v. Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Kawaihae v. Hawaiian Ins. CompaniesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
- Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Inlandboatmen's Union v. Sause Bros., Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- Nanakuli Paving & Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.