Legal Opinion

Cosmopolitan Financial Corp. v. Runnels

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1981No. 6453PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, C.J.

Appellant appeals from a judgment entered below finding liability against Appellee Runnels only on a promissory note due appellant.

The paramount issues raised on appeal are (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting testimony concerning contemporaneous statements made to defendants-appellees by the payee corporation’s officer to the effect that the promissory notes signed by them would not be enforced against them; and (2) whether indorsers-guarantors of a promissory note payable to a financial institution can be relieved of liability on the instrument…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Akamine & Sons, Ltd. v. American Security BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc. v. DolinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Wilson v. Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kawaihae v. Hawaiian Ins. CompaniesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Inlandboatmen's Union v. Sause Bros., Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Nanakuli Paving & Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API