Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Fugit

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1920No. 23,418PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Decatur Circuit Court; John W. Donaker, Judge. Action by Elizabeth Fugit against William F. Bobbins, executor of the will of Charles S. Williamson, deceased, and others. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, C. J.

Appellee brought suit against appellants to contest the probated will of her brother, Charles S. Williamson. The issue was undue influence and unsoundness of mind. The jury returned a general verdict in appellee’s favor.

It is claimed by appellants that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. This need not be decided, because the judgment must be reversed for other reasons, and on retrial the evidence will probably vary in many particulars from that adduced at this trial.

*1671. *166On the subject of monomania and hallucinations, *167the court gave the following instruction, at the request of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. BoggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ditton v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. St. John v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Keeshin Motor Express Co. v. GlassmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Zimmerman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. Seal, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API