Legal Opinion

Connor v. SKAGIT CORPORATION

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1983No. 48502-0PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Plaintiff appeals a Court of Appeals decision affirming a jury verdict for defendants in a products liability action. The most substantial issue presented is whether in a strict products liability action based on a design defect the plaintiff has the burden of proving the existence of a feasible and safer alternative product design. We hold that, where the plaintiff has based his allegation of design defect solely upon the possibility of alternative designs, the burden of proving the existence of those design alternatives falls on the plaintiff. We affirm the trial court and Court of Appeals.

P…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Estate of Ryder v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Haugen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Falk v. Keene Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Goodman v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Lenhardt v. Ford Motor CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pannell v. Food Services of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API