Legal Opinion
Rutenschroer v. Starr Seigle Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 29, 2006No. Civ.05-00364 ACK/BMKPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Kathryn L. Rutenschroer (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, alleged in her original Complaint that she suffered employment discrimination as an employee of Starr Sei-gle Communications, Inc. dba QMark (hereafter “Starr Seigle” or “Defendant”) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 based on her race, religion, gender, disability, sexual orientation, and marital status. Specifically, she pled that she was subjected to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Ryan v. SalisburyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. NCL America, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
- Gilmore v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Ryan v. SalisburyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.