United States v. Imm, Juvenile Male
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
IMM, a juvenile, appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2246 for sexually abusing his six year old cousin. To convict him of sexual abuse, the government had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt “contact between the penis and the vulva or the penis and the anus,” with “contact” defined as “penetration, however slight.” § 2246(2)(A). We conclude that the government’s jurisdictional certification under 18 U.S.C. § 5032 was sufficient, that the district court did not err in admitting the testimony of a seven year old witness, and that the evidence…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. I.F. (In re I.F.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- United States v. J.A.S.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Amended September 1, 2016 State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.