Legal Opinion

United States v. Imm, Juvenile Male

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2014No. 11-10317PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

IMM, a juvenile, appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2246 for sexually abusing his six year old cousin. To convict him of sexual abuse, the government had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt “contact between the penis and the vulva or the penis and the anus,” with “contact” defined as “penetration, however slight.” § 2246(2)(A). We conclude that the government’s jurisdictional certification under 18 U.S.C. § 5032 was sufficient, that the district court did not err in admitting the testimony of a seven year old witness, and that the evidence…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. I.F. (In re I.F.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. United States v. J.A.S.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Amended September 1, 2016 State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API