Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd Schlitter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 2016No. 13–0346Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAppel, Justice

I concur with the balance of the majority opinion but dissent on the question of whether Schlitter was subjected to an unwarned interrogation contrary to Miranda v. Arizona under the United States and Iowa Constitutions. 384 U.S. 436, 444-45, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1612, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 706-07 (1966).

I. Factual and Procedural Background.

The record reveals that law enforcement officers requested Schlitter to come to the state patrol office for questioning in connection with the death of his daughter. Schlitter drove himself to the station. He was then escorted to an interrogation room. The…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API