Legal Opinion

Foshee v. Wolters

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1948No. Civ. 3686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

The three cases involved in this appeal were consolidated for trial and appeal, and grew out of an automobile collision which happened at about 6 o ’clock p. m. on May 17, 1946, on U. S. Highway No. 80 about 6 miles east of Holt-ville in Imperial County.

Judgment went against plaintiffs and appellants, Kenneth and Virginia Foshee. Plaintiffs and respondents William G. Cloes and Arthur F. Wollgast were given judgment against John Kenneth Foshee; William G. Cloes in the sum of $6,- 002.81, and Arthur F. Wollgast in the sum of $2,007.21. The plaintiffs and respondents Wesley J. Wolters and Iona…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Sassano v. RoullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Syah v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Sandoval v. Southern California Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Eaton v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Dayton v. LandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API