Legal Opinion

Collier v. Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1956No. 402PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

When the petition for writ of certiorari was allowed, this in effect granted to petitioners the right of immediate appeal from the order of 6 September, 1956. In perfecting such appeal, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, apply.

The record before us contains no assignment of error. Even so, it shows that exception was taken to the order of 6 September, 1956; and the petition for certiorari was in effect an assignment of error directed to the entire order. This suffices to bring before this Court for review the question as to whether the court below was in error in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Woody v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Gallimore v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Eastern Steel Products Corporation v. ChestnuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NC, INC. v. City of ShelbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Anders v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API