Rangel v. Reynolds
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion & Order
ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.
This case arises from an alleged violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which Plaintiffs claim that their baby was taken from them on February 15, 2007, in violation of their Due Process and Fourth Amendment rights. There are currently twelve pending motions, including five nondispositive motions, and seven motions to dismiss filed by various Defendants in the case. It bears mentioning at the outset that this Court is aware that Plaintiffs are pro se litigants. As such, their pleadings must be held to less stringent standards than those drafted…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Economan v. CockrellDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Economan v. CockrellDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Hayes v. NarangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Kruse v. GerdischDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Milchtein v. Milwaukee CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.