Legal Opinion

Santos v. Franklin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-0230PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Richard J. Santos, a member of the United States Naval Reserve, seeks a writ of habeas corpus ordering his release from active duty in the United States Navy. Petitioner was called to active duty for a period of sixteen months under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 673a because he failed to attend the requisite number of training drills. Petitioner challenges his activation as a violation of his contractual and consti tutional rights. Alternatively, he claims that the Navy unlawfully denied his request for a hardship discharge. In addition to…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Qualls v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. United Jersey Bank v. CS Associates (In Re CS Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. In Re Car-Gill, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Grulke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API