Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Tye

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 27, 2004No. Nos. 21963-1-III; 21964-0-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appellants Kevin R. Tye and John H. Tresko argue the Spokane County Superior Court erred in denying their motions for change of judge. The sole issue in these consolidated cases is whether issuance of a computer-generated case scheduling order after an informal chambers conference is a prior judicial act of discretion that justifies denial of a motion for change of judge. It does not. Accordingly, we reverse.

FACTS

The facts are uncontested. In the Tresko matter, attorney David Crouse appeared on Mr. Tresko’s behalf for an informal, off-the-record, case status conference in Judge Paul A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. DennisonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. GudjonssonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hanno v. Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re the Parenting Plan of HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. John Hoag And Della Hoag, Pets. v. Car Wash Enterprises, Inc., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. LileWashington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API