Legal Opinion
Leon & H. Blum v. Wettermark
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1882No. Case No. 1326; Case No. 1330PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Appeal from Busk. Tried below before the Hon. A. J. Booty.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Chief Justice.
These cases, being in fact one and the same, have been consolidated and will be considered together. From the brief of counsel for Blum et al. we extract the following history of the case:
Leon & H. Blum, Holf, Weiss & Co. and Heidenheimer Bros., creditors of Morris Crown, acting in their own interest and that of the other creditors of Crown, brought this suit April 25,1881, against Sharp B. Whitley as assignee of said Crown, and against Charles L. Humully and Charles G. Burnett as the sureties on the official bond of said assignee, and against A. Wettermark and Foeke &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milam County v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Chambers v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Bryorly v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Puckett v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by39 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Townes v. Lattimore Dist. JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Chattanooga, Rome & Columbus Railroad v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Crawford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Goldman v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.