Legal Opinion
United States v. Obet Lagumbay Ramilo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1993No. 92-10079PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Obet Lagumbay Ramilo pled guilty to charges of wire fraud, interstate transportation of stolen property, and credit card fraud. The district court imposed concurrent sentences of thirty months imprisonment followed by three years supervised release. The district court also ordered Ramilo to pay $454,841.97 in restitution during the term of his supervised release. Ramilo challenges the restitution order.
Ramilo argues that in ordering him to pay nearly half of a million dollars in restitution during the three year period of supervised release, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Darlene G. BrucheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Clinton Dennis MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Bernard Addison BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Bruce Howard Rogat and Margo Kay RogatCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Bill LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Van AlstyneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Gary A. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Harold STODDARD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.