Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lentini

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 5, 1966No. 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

The defendant appealed to the Washington County Court from the action of the commissioners of the Estate of John Molla in allowing a claim presented against the estate by the plaintiff. This claim is in the form of a written instrument which plaintiff contends, and the defendant denies, constitutes a promissory note. Hearing below was by the court. The court found the instrument was a promissory note delivered to the plaintiff by the deceased and properly allowed as a claim against the estate of John Molla by the commissioners of the estate. Judgment was for the plaintiff and defendant’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of Beatty v. Western College of ToledoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  5. State v. TeitleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  2. In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  3. Anderson v. KnappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  4. Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  5. CASS-WARNER CORPORATION v. BrickmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API