Legal Opinion
State v. Ramos
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 2, 1981No. 2 CA-CR 2239PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of violating A.R.S. § 13-1802(A)(5) which provides:
“A. A person commits theft if, without lawful authority, such person knowingly:
5. Controls property of another knowing or having reason to know that the property was stolen; ...” (Emphasis added)
Appellant was apprehended by the police in a stolen automobile. The arresting officer testified that appellant was intoxicated. At trial, appellant requested the trial court, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-503, to instruct the jury that it could consider the fact of his intoxication in determining…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaGrand v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- LaGrand v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 433, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 631 Karl Hinze Lagrand v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Walter Burnhart Lagrand v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011