State v. Struss
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Richard Lyle Struss appeals a conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(a) (1984). He argues: he was denied his right to appeal because the transcript of the omnibus hearing was lost; the trial court abused its discretion in finding the five-year-old complainant competent to testify; the trial court erred in admitting hearsay statements by the complainant and the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant often babysat for the three children of his friend B.K. while she worked.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. SimeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003