State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This appeal is from convictions for first-degree and second-degree criminal sexual conduct. Minn.Stat. §§ 609.342, subd. 1(a), 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1988). This appeal was certified to the supreme court and later remanded for consideration in light of State v. Conklin, 444 N.W.2d 268 (Minn.1989). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Robert Ross was charged with acts of sexual abuse against T.S., his girlfriend’s four-year-old daughter. Ross lived with the child’s mother, from April to August 1987. T.S.’ mother testified that on August 10 or 11 of 1987, when she was bathing T.S., the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State of Minnesota v. Jairo Missael Fernandez SortoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024