Legal Opinion

Palatino v. Carlton Aluminum of New England, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 16, 1983Published

1Opinion of the CourtJodrey, J.

In this action plaintiff seeks recovery for defendant’s breach of contract to make certain repairs and improvements to plaintiffs real estate.

At the trial, there was evidence tending to show that:

In July 1975, plaintiff and defendant made an agreement wherein defendant undertook to furnish all necessary materials, labor, and workmanship to install aluminum siding on a house owned by the plaintiff at 27 Pope Street in Hudson. The agreement called for the installation of siding on all shingled areas of the house, the installation of six pairs of shutters, insulation with aluminum foil, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strong v. Haverhill Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Murray v. GrossmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Hale v. DodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Goodyear Service Stores v. GustafsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API