Legal Opinion

People v. Clay

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2001No. Docket 211768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Hood, P.J., and Holbrook, Jr., and Fitzgerald, JJ. Per Curiam.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. On original submission, over a dissent by Judge Holbrook, we affirmed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for relief from judgment, People v Clay, 239 Mich App 365; 608 NW2d 76 (2000), by concluding that the Legislature did not intend to require that the prosecution prove that a defendant was “lawfully imprisoned” when he was charged with assaulting a corrections officer while awaiting examination. The dissent concluded that this statutory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LoCiceroMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ClayMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API