Legal Opinion

People v. Clay

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2000No. Docket 211768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHood, P.J.

Defendant appeals, by leave granted, from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We affirm.

In March 1994, defendant was released from jail after serving sentences for convictions unrelated to the present action. The sentencing terms also required that defendant remain on a tether for six *367months. However, on March 8, 1994, defendant cut off his tether unit and absconded. On March 14, 1994, a bench warrant was issued for defendant’s probation violation. On March 17, 1994, police officers were stopped behind a vehicle waiting at a traffic light. Defendant got out of the vehicle…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. VenticinqueMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. NimethMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. GainesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. NealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ClayMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ChapinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. ChapinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API