Legal Opinion

Burton-Lingo Co. v. Federal Glass & Paint Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1932No. 1003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee against appellant on an itemized, verified account for goods, wares, and merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered by appellee to appellant at the special instance and request of J. M. Pearson, who was alleged to have been duly authorized to bind appellant by his contract of purchase. The facts out of which the litigation grew are briefly as follows:

On July 25, 1929, a written contract was executed by and between D. S. Bodzin, the owner of a building in the city of Colorado, and appellant, Burton-Lingo Company, and J. M. Pearson,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Labbe v. CorbettTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Reed v. BrewerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. McKinney v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Kottwitz v. Representatives of AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Martin v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Whatley v. Cato Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. In re Corrline International, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  5. R. L. Lipsey, Inc. v. Panama-Williams, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API