Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Andrews

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Williamson.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

While a number of the interrogatories propounded to his witnesses by appellee, which were excepted to by appellant upon the ground that they were leading, are not, in our opinion, liable to this objection, because they merely led the witnesses to the subject of inquiry, yet it is quite evident, on looking at the bill of exceptions, appellant’s objection to several of them *364on this ground was well taken; and, therefore, the ruling ' of the court in this particular, if no other, would require a reversal of the judgment. But as there is apparent in the record an error in…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Labbe v. CorbettTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Pioneer Mutual Compensation Corp. v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Perkins v. NevillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Futch v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Seibert v. SallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API