Legal Opinion
State v. Oney
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 25, 2009No. 2007-367PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendant appeals the Rutland District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress statements made at a police interview, arguing that the police violated his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Chapter I, Article 10 of the Vermont Constitution. The trial court found that defendant was not in custody at the time the incriminating statements were made and denied defendant’s motion. We affirm.
¶2. The material facts are not in dispute. In July 2006, defendant became a person of interest in a series of fires in the Rutland area. On July 26, the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. MunteanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. Godwin, Sr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- State v. Weisler, State v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. Hieu TranSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.