Legal Opinion

Hanson v. BCB, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1988No. 16942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

The appellants, Harold and Jesse Hanson, are husband and child of the deceased Patrice Hanson. Patrice Hanson (Hanson) was shot and killed in the parking lot while leaving the Hide-Out Saloon (saloon) where she had been performing as an exotic dancer. Appellants appeal a decision of the Industrial Commission (commission) which found that Patrice Hanson was an independent contractor and not an employee of the Hide-Out Saloon and thus not covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. We reverse and remand.

Hanson began dancing at the saloon after answering an ad in the Idaho…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ledesma v. BergesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Burdick v. ThorntonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Fitzen v. Cream Top DairyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Madison v. J.I. Morgan, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matter of HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Madison v. J.I. Morgan, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Swanson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API