Hayne v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeal is from the judgment. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are owners in common of a lot on the corner of Stockton and Washington Streets, in San Francisco, and that the defendant, without right, claims an interest therein adverse to plaintiffs. They ask judgment quieting their title. This relief the court below awarded to them.
The defendant in its answer claims a lien upon the lot by virtue of an assessment levied thereon to pay the cost of a tunnel constructed under Stockton Street from Bush Street to a point near Sacramento Street. The court below decided that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. Camp SingMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- KingmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hanscom v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Bradley Co. v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Stege v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.