Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1938No. Civ. 11902Published

1Opinion of the Court

29 Cal.App.2d 539 (1938)

JEANETTE P. EMERSON, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 11902.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate Dictrict, Division Two.

December 3, 1938.

Marion P. Betty for Petitioner.

J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, S. V. O. Prichard, Assistant County Counsel, and Ned Marr, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents.

McComb, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent court to make an order permitting petitioner to prosecute an action filed by her and now pending in said court without the prepayment of jury fees.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Young v. BruereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Emerson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API