Emerson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
29 Cal.App.2d 539 (1938)
JEANETTE P. EMERSON, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.
Civ. No. 11902.
California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate Dictrict, Division Two.
December 3, 1938.
Marion P. Betty for Petitioner.
J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, S. V. O. Prichard, Assistant County Counsel, and Ned Marr, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents.
McComb, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent court to make an order permitting petitioner to prosecute an action filed by her and now pending in said court without the prepayment of jury fees.
The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Young v. BruereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Emerson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938