Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1938No. Civ. 11902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent court to make an order permitting petitioner to prosecute an action filed by her and now pending in said court without the prepayment of jury fees.

The essential facts are:

Petitioner filed an action in respondent court to recover damages for personal injuries received by her. She thereafter made application to said court for an order permitting her to prosecute her action before a jury without the prepayment of jury fees. This order was denied by the trial judge on the sole and only ground that petitioner’s attorney of record had an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. County of Sutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Sloatman v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Emerson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Felton v. FinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API