Legal Opinion

Hockett v. Chapman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1961No. 6968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This is a personal injury action. The appeal results from the dismissal of appellant’s complaint on the ground that appellant, having received workmen’s compensation benefits, may not recover for the negligence of a coemployee where the damages sought are based on injuries received in an accident arising out of and in the course of employment and where such injuries were caused by the negligence of a coemployee.

Appellant and appellees were fellow employees. Appellant was injured as the result of a collision between a truck driven by appellee Chapman, in which he was a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Reed v. StyronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Meyer v. KendigWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Markle v. WilliamsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Roda v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Defoe v. PhillipSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API