In re HTC Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Prost, Chief Judge.
ORDER
HTC Corporation petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to (a) vacate its December 18, 2017 order denying-in-part HTC Corporation's motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) ; and (b) dismiss the complaint against HTC Corporation. 3G Licensing, S.A., Orange S.A., and Koninklijke KPN N.V. (collectively, "Respondents") oppose.
In January 2017, Respondents filed their patent infringement suit against HTC Corporation, a Taiwanese corporation with its principal place of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- In Re GOOGLE LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
- Valeant Pharmaceuticals v. Mylan PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- In Re: Oath Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.