Legal Opinion
In Re: Oath Holdings Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 14, 2018No. 2018-157PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
ORDER
This is the second petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Oath Holdings Inc. (formerly known as Yahoo Holdings, Inc.) to challenge the district court's conclusion that Oath missed its opportunity to object to venue in the Eastern District of New York for the patent case filed against it. When Oath first sought mandamus, we denied the request, stating that Oath should ask the district court to reconsider its initial conclusion in light of In re Micron Technology, Inc. , 875 F.3d 1091 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Oath made that request to the district court, but the court reached the same…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Bank of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Berall v. Verathon Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- CR Bard v. AngioDynamicsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- CR Bard v. AngioDynamicsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- CR Bard v. Smiths Medical ASDDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- CR Bard, Inc. v. Smiths Medical ASD, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.