Legal Opinion

In Re Invol. Dissol. of Battle Creek Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1998No. S-96-062PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

STATEMENT OF CASE

This appeal presents the question of whether an allegedly oppressed minority shareholder may invoke involuntary dissolution proceedings pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 21-2096 to 21-20,104 (Reissue 1991) to dissolve a Nebraska bank. We conclude that such a shareholder may not invoke involuntary dissolution proceedings in the district courts. Rather, the proper venue is the Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance (Department), pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 8-187 (Reissue 1997).

Section 8-187, which empowers the Department to take possession of a Nebraska bank and conduct its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barks v. Cosgriff Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Elkhorn v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Placek v. EdstromNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Boettcher v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Four R Cattle Co. v. MullinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bergan Mercy Health System v. HavenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Central States Foundation v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lyle Stoneman v. United Nebraska BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Keller v. TavaroneNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Blue Valley Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API