Legal Opinion

Utica National Bank Trust Company v. Couch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1975No. 47749PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

This is an application for this Court to assume original jurisdiction and issue alternative writs of mandamus and prohibition to prevent a judge of the District Court of Cleveland County from exercising further jurisdiction over petitioner, the Utica National Bank and Trust Company, a National Banking Association, of Tulsa, Oklahoma, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Utica, in Cause No. C-74-551.

It presents a venue question arising by reason of a federal statute, 12 U.S.C.A., Sec. 94, which provides as follows:

“Actions and proceedings against any association under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Mills v. District Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. State Ex Rel. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. First National Bank of CarmenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Brooks Hall Corp. v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API