Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. First National Bank of Carmen

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1976No. 49245PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOX, Judge:

An appeal by Donald and Madelyn Rug-gles, plaintiffs in the trial court, from an order of the District Court of Tulsa County dismissing their action on the ground that the court lacked venue to hear the case.

In 1973, plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Rug-gles, sold a tract of land located in Tulsa County to the Mark Trading Company. A purchase money mortgage was executed in favor of the Ruggles as security for the balance of the purchase price and was duly recorded shortly thereafter.

The purchaser defaulted in 1974, and as a consequence, plaintiffs foreclosed the mortgage and purchased the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Misco Leasing, Inc., Formerly Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. L. L. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Court of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. McNee v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. OAK TREE PARTNERS, LLC v. WILLIAMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of Oklahoma Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API