Legal Opinion

Whittlesey v. . Frantz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1878PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fourth judicial department, in favor of defendant, entered upon an order denying a motion for a new trial, and directing judgment on an order nonsuiting plaintiff on trial, where exceptions were ordered to be heard at first instance at General Term. The nature of the action and the facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fourth judicial department, in favor of defendant, entered upon an order denying a motion for a new trial, and directing judgment on an order nonsuiting plaintiff on trial, where exceptions were ordered to be heard at first instance at General Term. The nature of the action and the facts appear sufficiently in the opinion. Plaintiff’s appointment appearing by the record its regularity cannot be questioned collaterally, or otherwise, than in a direct proceeding for that purpose. (Sagory v. Dubois, 3 Sandf. Ch., 485, 486;…

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This action was brought to recover from the original defendant, Frantz, on his subscription to the capital stock of “ The Excelsior Hay Carrier Company, of Rochester, R. Y.,” a manufacturing corporation, organized under the act of 1848. The defendant, after the organization of the company, subscribed for twenty shares of its stock, of the par value of $100 each, and no part of the subscription has been paid. On the 12th of February, 1874, Raymond and Huntington commenced an action against “ The Excelsior Hay Carrier Company ” upon a note purporting to be made by that company and the summons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bangs v. . DuckinfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hatfield v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Farmers' State Bank v. InmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Texas Printing & Lithographing Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Yarbrough v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API