Storf v. Papalia
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Van Winkle, A. M.
The parties, who apparently were then domiciled in New Jersey, were married on May 11th, 1935, in New York City, by a deputy city clerk. In answering one of the questions on the application for the license, defendant declared that there was “no legal impediment” to her marrying. The fact is that the defendant had been theretofore twice confined at the New Jersey State Hospital, (keystone Park. The parties lived in New Jersey as husband and wife till October or November, 1940, when the defendant was again committed *147to an asylum for the insane, this time to the Hudson County…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tyll v. KellerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Daniele v. MarguliesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Buechler v. SimonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houlahan v. HorzepaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Wilkins v. ZelichowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957