Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Dunigan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the three defendants. The action which terminated in the attacked judgment was predicated upon averments that an automobile operated by the defendants negligently collided with one owned by the plaintiff, thereby injuring the plaintiff in person and property. The complaint assumed the form of two counts, but the averments of negligence were the same in each. The first count sought damages for injury to property (automobile); the second, for injury to person.

The defendants are Loren Dunigan, operator of the ear which the complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashmun v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Burgess v. Charles A. Wing Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Riley v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Morris v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bach v. ChezemOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Olson v. TruaxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  2. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. South Beach Marina, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Wiggins v. State, Use of CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API