Legal Opinion
Baker v. McCall
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2:11CV00037PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge.
This case is presently before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs first amended complaint and the plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion will be granted and the plaintiffs motion will be dismissed as moot.
Background
The following summary of the facts, which is taken from the plaintiffs first amended complaint, is accepted as true for purposes of the defendants’ motions to dismiss. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 167…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vollette v. WatsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Wootten v. Commonwealth of VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
- Butters v. James Madison UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
- John Doe v. Furman UniversityDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
- Scratch Golf LLC v. Beaufort CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.