Legal Opinion
Pierside Terminal Operators, Inc. v. M/V FLORIDIAN
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 6, 1974No. Civ. 5-73-N, 9-73-N and 176-73-NPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
Don Julio Corporation and Mike Cruz Machine Shop, Inc. have filed motions for summary judgment against Contain^ erships, Inc., former owners of the FLORIDIAN, for certain debts for repairs to the FLORIDIAN ordered by Marine and Marketing International Corporation, the bare boat charterer or the FLORIDIAN.
It has long been the maritime law that the owners of a vessel are not personally liable for goods or services furnished to the vessel on order of a bare boat charterer of the vessel. The U.S. 219, 21 F.Supp. 463 (E.D.Pa.1937); The Lizzie Burt, 16…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rupert CityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- The Theodore RooseveltDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
- The U. S. 219District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
- The Lizzie BurtDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1936
- Kahn v. Niagara Laundry & Linen Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Equilease Corp. v. M/V SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Dowell Division of Dow Chemical Co. v. Franconia Sea Transport, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Adriatic Ship Supply Co., Inc. v. M/V SHAULADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Liverpool & London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. M/V AbraDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003
- Champagne v. Uncle John M/VDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.