Legal Opinion
Liverpool & London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. M/V Abra
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided November 19, 2003No. CIV.A.01-136-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
BRADY, District Judge.
A bench trial in this maritime dispute began on June 24, 2002 and ended June 25, 2002. Having considered the admissible evidence, the credibility of the witnesses’ testimony, the arguments of counsel presented at trial, and the relevant law, this Court grants judgment in favor of Liverpool and London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Association Limited, (“Liverpool and London” or “L & L”) and against the M/V Abra (ex Kappa Unity) and Inter-force Shipping Company (“Interforce”), as claimant, for the reasons more fully explained below.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog v. Signal Oil & Gas Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Equilease Corp. v. M/V SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Royal Insurance Company of America and Royal Lloyds of Texas v. Quinn-L Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ampelmann Operations B V v. Atlantic Oceanic U K LtdDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Beech v. FV WishboneDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2015