Legal Opinion
Adriatic Ship Supply Co., Inc. v. M/V SHAULA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-4949PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Adriatic Ship Supply Company brought this action alleging that it was never compensated for supplies it furnished to the vessels M/V SHAULA, M/V FOMALHAUT and M/V HANNATU. After a non-jury trial on the claims against defendant M/V SHAULA, in rem, and defendants Knud Larsen and Fourth Tower Shipping Company, 1 in personam, I have concluded that plaintiff is entitled to judgment only against M/V SHAULA, for the value of the supplies furnished to it. This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Karavos Compania Naviera S. A. v. Atlantica Export Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V MontmartreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. The Bensinger Company, United States of America v. The Hobart Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Georgetown Yacht Basin, Inc. v. M/V Fourth PawnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- ATLANTIC POWER AND ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SAFER TUG & BARGE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Hargus v. Ferocious & Impetuous, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2015
- Hargus v. Ferocious & Impetuous, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2015
- United States v. Chevron, U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990