Legal Opinion
Jones v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1985No. 83-2126PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether the decision in DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), should be applied retroactively.1 We hold that it should not under the circumstances of this case.
I
David D. Jones was employed as a warehouseman by Consolidated Freightways Corporation in Denver, Colorado. The terms and conditions of his employment were governed by a collective bargaining agreement between Consolidated Freight-ways and Local No. 17 of the Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers. Jones…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mitchell v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Garcia v. Eidal International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Driscoll v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Johnston v. CIGNA Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Jones v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.