Legal Opinion
Globig v. Greene & Gust Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 13, 1961No. 59-C-153PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
Defendant, Burton Plumbing-Heating Co., Inc. (hereafter referred to as “Burton”), has moved to dismiss this action, or in lieu thereof to quash the return of the summons on the ground that there was no compliance with Section 180.847 (4), Wis.Stats. (1957). 1
Burton’s motion to dismiss the action is further predicated on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations has allegedly barred the plaintiff’s cause of action.
It is conceded that plaintiff did not comply with Section 180.847(4), which relates to substituted service of process on foreign corporations…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Bode v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Globig v. Greene & Gust Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
- North Branch Products, Inc. v. FisherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. LindseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- M. Katz & Son Billiard Products, Inc. v. G. Correale & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Merz v. HemmerleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Don A. Hasse, Administrator of the Estate of Frances Hasse, Deceased v. American Photograph Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.