Legal Opinion
Thayer v. Uninsured Employers' Fund
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1999No. 99-002PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
¶ 1 Phyllis Thayer filed a petition in the Montana Workers’ Compensation Court in which she alleged that the Uninsured Employers’ Fund wrongfully terminated payment of her survivor benefits pursuant to § 39-71-511, MCA. The Workers’ Compensation Court concluded that the Uninsured Employers’ Fund properly terminated Phyllis’ benefits and that § 39-71-511, MCA, did not violate Article II, Section 16 of the Montana Constitution. Phyllis appeals from that decision. We affirm the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court.
¶2 Thayer raises the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Did the Workers’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
- Woirhaye v. Montana Fourth Judicial DistrictcourtMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Ashcraft v. Montana Power CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1971
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. W. P. Rose Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Trankel v. State, Dept. of Military AffairsMontana Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Olson v. DaughenbaughMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Auto Parts v. Employment Relations Division Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Shattuck v. Kalispell Regional Medical Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
- Ortiz Jiménez v. Rivera NúñezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.