Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of Tacoma
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Equity. Suit by the Sperry & Hutchinson Company against the City of Tacoma, Wash., and others. On motion for the cancellation of an injunction bond.
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
On the 29th of July, 1911, plaintiff began this action against the defendants, to enjoin and restrain them from enforcing an ordinance of the city of Tacoma, and from collecting a license fee thereunder from persons and firms using plaintiff’s trading stamps. An order was issued by the court, .restraining the defendants from enforcing said ordinance, to secure which order a bond was given by plaintiff, conditioned that the plaintiff should pay all damages and costs which should accrue by reason of the issuance and continuance of the restraining order.
In October, 1911,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Palmer v. . FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Olds v. CaryOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Scott v. FrankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Coosaw Min. Co. v. Carolina Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.