Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Romano
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 27, 1988No. 87-C-917, 87-C-964PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CURRAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robin Gardner and Danielle Hedtcke commenced the above-captioned consolidated cases claiming that defendant Frank Romano and defendant Hildegard Artmann, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of her deceased husband Josef Artmann, discriminated against them on the basis of race by refusing to rent apartments to them. The apartments were located in a multifamily complex at 5751 North 94th Street in the City of Milwaukee and had been advertised for rent in the daily newspaper. The complex was owned by the Artmanns and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Sola Basic Industries, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Tews Funeral Home, Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Ranger Ins. Co. v. Bal Harbour ClubSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Martin v. BrunzelleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Powell v. Alemaz, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.