Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Moore
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1931No. 22642. En BancPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Two actions were consolidated for trial and for appeal herein.
Appellants Gustave Dahl and Lena Dahl are husband and wife. They brought suit against respondents for "damages due to injuries received in an automobile accident. Appellant Lena Dahl, as executrix of the estate of Sophia Gordon, sued for damages for the death of Sophia Gordon, which resulted from the same automobile accident. At the conclusion of the case in chief of appellants, upon motion of both respondents in both cases, the trial court granted non-suits, from which these appeals were brought.
The non-suits were granted by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.