Latz v. Parr
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Mary Paone Latz v. Jacob Parr, No. 977, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Kenney, J. ANIMALS – INJURIES TO PERSONS – DUTIES AND LIABILITIES IN GENERAL Prior to April 1, 2012, recovery for injuries caused by a dog could be pursued under theories of both negligence and strict liability. As this Court explained in Slack v. Villari,
59 Md. App. 462, 470
(1984), “negligence that exposes an animal owner who is unaware of the animal’s dangerous propensities” is the “failure to control the [dog] or prevent the harm caused by it.” See also Moura v. Randall,
119 Md. App. 632, 644
(1998). NEGLIGENCE – BREACH…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.