Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
People of Michigan v. William Little
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 2016No. Docket 149872, 149873, and 150042Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMarkman, J.
I agree with the majority opinion to the extent that it holds that the Fifth Amendment does not preclude the use of false statements by a law enforcement officer in a prosecution for obstruction of justice. However, I respectfully disagree with it to the extent that it holds that the disclosures by law enforcement officers act (DLEOA), MCL 15.391 et seq., precludes the use of false statements by a law enforcement officer in a prosecution for obstruction of justice. That is, contrary to the majority, I agree with the Court of Appeals that false statements do not constitute “information” and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.